Rush Limbaugh

The Supreme Court is about the Constitution. It is about constitutionality. It is about the law. At its bear simplest, it\'s about the law. It is not about the Democrat Party agenda. Because that\'s what it\'s become. The whole judiciary has become that because that\'s the kind of people they have put on various courts as judges, and every liberal justice on the Supreme Court is a social justice warrior first and a judge of the law second. And if they get one more, then they will have effectively corrupted the Supreme Court.

If Democrats get another Elena Kagan, who has no business being there, if they get another Senorita Sonia Sotomayor, if they get another Stephen Breyer, who may be one of the absolute worst, Ruth \"Buzzi\" Ginsburg, if they get another one of these, then we don\'t have a Supreme Court, folks.

Remember, the Democrats want illegal migrants as voters. The Democrats need a permanent underclass. Donald Trump is looking at all of this. Every bit of his agenda as aimed at making America great again. It\'s not just a slogan with him.

Democrats believed in \"progressivism.\" They believed in Big Government. But they at least attached optimistic outcomes to it. They really believed they were helping America. They really believed they were helping families, helping people. Now they\'ve just become, \"The country\'s horrible, it\'s rotten, it needs to be reformed!\" The liberals of John F. Kennedy\'s day did not think there was anything really major wrong with this country.

You\'re not allowed to criticize Obama because of his race. And I thought feminism made us all the same, we\'re all equal. Everybody\'s a tough guy now, so why can\'t we criticize women? Hillary Clinton is a nasty woman.

The point is that Hillary Clinton is running on all these ideas. She\'s gonna do this and she gonna do that. She\'s gonna fix this. She\'s got a massive new economic plan that\'s not gonna add a penny to the national debt, while Donald Trump\'s will add 20 trillion to the national debt. What she does, she always pivots and goes back to the Children\'s Defense Fund. \"Well, I started working in the 1970s for women and children, Children\'s Defense Fund.\" That\'s magic and you\'re not supposed to question nothing further after that.

How many campaigns of your life have you heard candidates of both parties promise a fix for the Social Security system? And everybody\'s got a plan. Every damned candidate has had a plan, and yet it remains unfunded, biggest part of the budget, no end in sight, no solution has ever worked.

They benefit from all these people, \"I just don\'t like the fighting. Could you stop the shouting? All I want to do is just get along.\" They\'re easily able to bulldoze large groups of people into laying down and letting it happen in the hope that this will be peace, in the hope that there will be no confrontations, in the hope that the shouting will stop.

The Democrats\' version of immigration is all about securing additional votes.

Hillary Clinton thinks the government ought to have the power to eliminate - they go after Donald Trump saying he wants to expand libel laws. Hillary Clinton and the Democrat Party want to limit what you can say.

I am not the kind of person that wants to enforce my wants, likes, desires, on everybody else. I have no desire that everybody like what I like. I have no desire everybody say what I want to hear said. I have no desire everybody stop whatever they\'re doing and listen to what I have to say. I have no desire that everybody agree. No, that\'s not true. I do wish everybody agreed, but I\'m not gonna sit around and force that on people.

The Catholic Church spends a lot of time in very poor countries trying to recruit and spread the Gospel. Let me put it that way: The pope is simply saying...? Has he ever said that Mao Tse-tung, that Fidel Castro, that Raul Castro, any other communist is not a Christian? Why Donald Trump? \'Cause Trump wants to build a wall?

Pope Francis said the use of contraception could be justified in regions hit by the Zika virus; a stance that could reignite a debate over the church\'s prohibition of the use of condoms to stop the spread of the AIDS virus. The pope also criticized Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump as \'not Christian\' for his immigration stance, and broke with his predecessors by suggesting that Catholic lawmakers are free to vote for same-sex marriage and civil unions if they want to.

What is the pope doing ing himself - he\'s the Vicar of Christ. He is the worldwide leader of the Catholic faith. What is he doing ing himself into the American political system this way? That to me is the larger question.

The Democrats are between a rock and a hard place on it. They hate the Second Amendment. They want to get rid of it, but if they come out and say that they will lose the election, so they have to lie, as Hillary Clinton did. \"I\'m for the Second Amendment. I\'ve been upstate in New York and I\'ve seen those weird things these guys use when they hunt, and I\'m not opposed to that, but the Heller decision and toddlers and Washington and I protected children and I think it\'s horrible.\"

Why do you people want to continue to import people that are going to end up placing a burden on our population? Why? If we\'re going to have an immigration policy, why don\'t we seek the best? Why do you people purposely want to go out and bring people in who are gonna end up being a burden? Now, you can define that as not learning English, not being able to have a job, being on the social safety welfare net, however you want to define it. But that\'s what Donald Trump means, because that\'s precisely what the Democrats want to do.

Has the pope questioned the faith of any communist leaders? He spends a lot of time in communist countries.

Here is what Hillary Clinton said. Crooked Hillary said, \"You know, when we talk about the Supreme Court\" - fake smile - \"it really raises the central issue in this election, namely what kind of country are we going to be.\" Well, she\'s right about that, actually, but not in the way she means. \"What kind of opportunities will we provide our citizens.\" The Supreme Court\'s not about that. Supreme Court is the law, and their cases are not about opportunities being provided for our citizens.

We are used to being sold out by people we elect.

I thought Donald Trump once again just missed a whole bunch of opportunities to bury Hillary Clinton, and he missed them because he\'s not a politician, and he\'s not instinctively oriented toward the ideological explanations that undergird Hillary\'s policies.

Gun control and the specifics of it, like immigration, it\'s not really about the substance when it comes to RINO Republicans supporting it. It is about appearing sophisticated. It\'s about appearing superiorly educated, and it\'s about qualifying for admittance in the club of elites. And you\'ll never be invited to the right parties, cocktail or otherwise, in Manhattan or Washington or LA or San Francisco or what have you.

We\'ve elected an untested prima donna, zero, zilch, nada experience, and it\'s coming home to roost, clear for one and all to see, and the guy thinks he\'s better and smarter than everybody else, is an aristocrat, an elitist, and is hell-bent on getting even with whatever he thinks the grievances of America have been in the past. Barack Obama equals politics of grievance. He has rallied an entire nation against him, and, believe me, it\'s a larger number of people than you would ever know, because the media of course is not portraying these numbers accurately.

There are rights that Hillary Clinton doesn\'t like. American people have too many rights. There\'s too much freedom. Government doesn\'t have enough rights, in her mind. Government\'s too limited. The Constitution limits the government way, way, way too much. \"And I feel strongly that\" - fake smile - \"the Supreme Court needs to stand on the side of the American people.\" Not on the side of the powerful corporations and the wealthy.

Do not forget that there are millions of Americans, who when they hear about gun control measures, are gonna be loudly applauding it. You know how many dumkoffs there are out there who think that it is the gun that is the problem in our culture, and you know how people believe in this gun control business \'cause whatever reasons they support it. You know it\'s gonna be applauded, and it\'s gonna be applauded in the Drive-By Media.

Remember, folks - do not doubt me on this - the media gets up every day hoping, praying, dreaming, thinking that that day something is going to surface or happen that will end up being the silver bullet that gets rid of Donald Trump.

The Washington establishment does not like the Tea Party. Don\'t you love all these politicians that run around and campaign as outsiders, anti-establishment, \'I\'m not part of that Washington culture.\' Well, then join the Tea Party, \'cause that\'s who\'s really anti-establishment, that\'s who\'s really a bunch of outsiders is the Tea Party. But you don\'t see those politicians who want to be considered outsiders joining or embracing the Tea Party, do you?

Barack Obama and his followers and his adorers have decided he can bring us all together, that he can reach across aisles, he can reach across oceans. Who knows, he might be able to reach across galaxies, bring people together, to find common ground from the mountaintop, and so, my friends.

Even if a majority of scientists agree on something, they know that if they don\'t agree on it they\'re not going to get their funding anymore, they won\'t have jobs. If it could be proven that there is no man made global warming, Heidi Cullen might be out of a job.

Donald Trump has been frustrated because the Republicans won\'t do anything, so he\'s going over to the Democrat side, and he\'s doing deals - and in order to do that, the Democrats are running the show. The media wants you to believe that Trump is acquiescing to the Democrat agenda just so he can do deals and just so there can be something done.

They are not asking you in there for them to learn, contrary to what they\'re saying. That\'s not what leftists do. They\'re not asking you to come in and teach them anything. They want to browbeat you. They want to find out why you\'re so stupid. They want to find out what you\'re missing. They want to find out why their brilliance is not reaching and connecting to you. They don\'t think there\'s anything wrong with them. What\'s wrong is their reader base, and they want to figure out what\'s wrong with you.